关于

历史类比

治理的每一次扩张都源于对危机的认识。 The League of Nations followed the First World War. The United Nations followed the Second. Each institution addressed the limitations of its predecessor.

我们正处于类似的转折点。 The challenges of the 21st century—transnational finance, digital infrastructure, climate systems, pandemic risk—cannot be managed by nation-states alone. Yet no legitimate democratic body exists with the authority to coordinate collective action at the required scale.

问题阐述

问题是结构性的：权力的规模已经超出了问责结构。 power has scaled beyond accountability structures.

Tax havens, regulatory arbitrage, investor-state dispute mechanisms, and platform monopolies all operate in governance-free zones. Democratic institutions, designed for the nation-state era, lack the jurisdiction and tools to assert public interest over these transnational systems.

演进论点

联邦制解决了这个问题。 When local governance proved insufficient, states formed federations—pooling sovereignty to address collective problems while maintaining local autonomy where appropriate.

我们需要全球治理。 We do not need world government. We need global governance: limited, accountable, and focused on the problems that nations cannot solve alone.

贡献者

我们的工作

我们撰写白皮书。 We document what will be built—not protest what currently exists.