О проекте
Архитекторы следующего уровня управления
Историческая параллель
Каждое расширение управления возникало в результате осознания кризиса. The League of Nations followed the First World War. The United Nations followed the Second. Each institution addressed the limitations of its predecessor.
Мы находимся в аналогичной точке перегиба. The challenges of the 21st century—transnational finance, digital infrastructure, climate systems, pandemic risk—cannot be managed by nation-states alone. Yet no legitimate democratic body exists with the authority to coordinate collective action at the required scale.
Постановка проблемы
Проблема носит структурный характер: власть переросла структуры подотчетности. power has scaled beyond accountability structures.
мирового ВВП
Tax havens, regulatory arbitrage, investor-state dispute mechanisms, and platform monopolies all operate in governance-free zones. Democratic institutions, designed for the nation-state era, lack the jurisdiction and tools to assert public interest over these transnational systems.
Аргумент в пользу эволюции
Федерализм решил это. When local governance proved insufficient, states formed federations—pooling sovereignty to address collective problems while maintaining local autonomy where appropriate.
Нам нужно глобальное управление. We do not need world government. We need global governance: limited, accountable, and focused on the problems that nations cannot solve alone.
Участники
Наша работа
Мы выпускаем «белые книги». We document what will be built—not protest what currently exists.