Sobre nosotros

Arquitectos de la próxima capa de gobernanza

Paralelo histórico

Cada expansión de la gobernanza ha surgido del reconocimiento de una crisis. The League of Nations followed the First World War. The United Nations followed the Second. Each institution addressed the limitations of its predecessor.

Estamos en un punto de inflexión similar. The challenges of the 21st century—transnational finance, digital infrastructure, climate systems, pandemic risk—cannot be managed by nation-states alone. Yet no legitimate democratic body exists with the authority to coordinate collective action at the required scale.

Planteamiento del problema

El problema es estructural: el poder ha escalado más allá de las estructuras de rendición de cuentas. power has scaled beyond accountability structures.

70%

del PIB mundial

Tax havens, regulatory arbitrage, investor-state dispute mechanisms, and platform monopolies all operate in governance-free zones. Democratic institutions, designed for the nation-state era, lack the jurisdiction and tools to assert public interest over these transnational systems.

El argumento de la evolución

El federalismo resolvió esto. When local governance proved insufficient, states formed federations—pooling sovereignty to address collective problems while maintaining local autonomy where appropriate.

Necesitamos una gobernanza global. We do not need world government. We need global governance: limited, accountable, and focused on the problems that nations cannot solve alone.

Colaboradores

Nuestro trabajo

Producimos libros blancos. We document what will be built—not protest what currently exists.